MyFox
 

SterlingScott's Blog

by SterlingScott from Austin, Texas

Last Post 121 days, 4 hours Ago


A lot are wondering what to do about all the people facing and faced with foreclosure. Should the government get involved with this process? Who’s more at fault, the lender or the borrower?

There is currently a bill that is against predatory lending, but it favors governmental interaction on many different levels. Should the people that are faced with foreclosure be helped through taxing others, or should the free market hold people responsible?

Tell me what you guys think, and ask me any question regarding the bill or ideas that you may have? 

3 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 3
Page 1 of 1
Delusion read my blog view my photos
May 1, 2008 | 10:57 AM

If I get a credit card in the mail promising 1% interest for 2 years, then 25% interest after that, and I run the card for a few thousand dollars the first couple of years until I am hit with those high interest rates, is it my fault or the credit card's?
Of course it is my fault.
The mortgage mess is really the lender's and the borrower's fault. People earning 30k should not be offered a home worth 800k with 'easy terms for the first few years', and the borrower should know better.
Back to the credit cards: many more people are 'taken advantage of' in this way than in the mortgage mess, will the government bail them out as well?
My question is this: Are we all just going to stop taking responsibility for our economic decisions and are we just going to let those predators continue to hoodwink the (strangely ignorant) public?

SterlingScott read my blog
May 1, 2008 | 11:43 AM

Ya. I agree that it is both the lender and borrower at fault. The bill HR 3915 (anti-predditory loan act of 2007) suggests that the blame should primarily fall on the lender. But that takes even more responsablilty away from the borrower. Furthermore, why should people who haven't gotten involved in this mess be held responsible, through taxation, to bail out the people that have? In this scenario, more people are suffering - those who nothing to do with it & those who do.
On the other hand, letting the free market balance itself out over time may not bring justice to those who have been getting rich off others' financial missouri. Right?

Delusion read my blog view my photos
May 1, 2008 | 1:49 PM

Right, yet remember the only way the free market can sort this out in an objective way is if those predators are exposed. If you know a restaurant is bad, you won't go there, right? If you don't, you will. These lenders must be held accountable (jail to the worst, major fines for the rest. Perhaps through a rating system, as with restaurants. Also, borrowers should take an economics class before making a major purchase, but of course that is a pipe dream.

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




SterlingScott

I'm a Fox 7 News intern and attend St. Edward's University. I will be Graduating in May. I post blogs about random things that are usually funny, depending on who you talk to. So check them out and let me know what you think.

Member Since: 1/25/2008