MyFox
 

mspurlin's Blog

by mspurlin

Last Post 6 days, 22 hours Ago


Not me, that for sure!  If you ever met me, I would probably be the biggest college football fan you would ever meet in your life, specifically the Longhorns.  And I don’t care if ANY of the Longhorn players ever get a college degree.  I watch football to see my team win, not because I think the people are academically successful.

Now the NCAA just came out with its Academic Progress Rate which is its current arbitrary way of determining who is a good school.  Now I have to give the NCAA credit for at least reforming this method.  The old method that they used to publish simply calculated how many players graduated from the institution over a 6 year period.

So if a player came to college and left early to go the NFL, it counted against the school’s “graduation rate”.  Or if a player transferred and went to another school it would count against the school, even if that player graduated somewhere else.  Or if a player died, it counts against the school.  That is why the University of Texas was penalized for the death of player Cole Pittman. 

So good for them for reforming them.  But let’s not hand out too many pats on the back for the NCAA.  This is only the latest form of ridiculous hypocrisy from the largest group of hypocrites in the entire nation.

I just don’t think it is the school’s responsibility to make sure people graduate. Should the school provide resources to help a student in trouble? Yes. Should a school be monitored to make sure they aren’t hindering the athlete’s ability to graduate, by forcing him to take certain classes that allow him to practice more.  Absolutely.

But should a school be punished if a kid goes to college and decides he just does not want to graduate?  Heck no.  These people are adults. If they don’t want to do the work to graduate, isn’t that their fault and not the school’s?

And why do we want to look at student athletes different than regular students?  My sister entered the University of Texas at Austin in the fall of 2002.  At the time, she was part of the largest freshman class in the history of UT.  My parents went to a parent orientation session where an admissions counselor told all the parents not worry, because that will be much smaller by the time these students were seniors.  At the time, UT had a 75% graduation rate.  

The university was actually encouraging kids to drop out so that the class size was more manageable.  So student athletes have to overcome institutional roadblocks and are expected to graduate no matter what.  Why is that?

It is not that hard to get a college degree if you do a minimal amount of work.  You can find an easy major and C your way to graduation no problem.  So some people just don’t want to take advantage of that.   Shouldn’t that be their choice?

And what is the problem if they leave early and go to a professional league?  More power to them, they may never need a college degree. 

I am not against getting a college degree.  I have two of them, one of which is a master’s. I think having a college degree offers you a great advantage.  However, I am not an elitist and I do not believe it is the only way to achieve happiness or success.

Bill Gates does not have a college degree.  Does anybody think he is not living up to his potential?  Neither do tons of other billionaires. 

I just think that some people should be taking responsibility for their own life.  If somebody remains academically eligible for a few years, but decides to leave college without a degree, that should be his choice.  I think it is a waste to lose an opportunity to get a free degree, but shouldn’t that be his choice?

 It certainly doesn’t matter to me on Saturday. As long as they are playing by the rules while in school, who really cares if they get a piece of paper with their name on it?  Not me, it is their decision to whatever they want with their life. 

See, the NCAA is trying to come down hard on some schools, especially smaller schools and take away their scholarships from schools like UT-Arlington, just so they can pretend college athletics are about education.  The NCAA does not get tens of BILLIONS, with a B, dollars from tv networks because these players are students.

Nope, they want to come down hard on these athletes because they want to keep up the farce that these people are amateur athletes.  They don’t want to have to pay them for the BILLIONS that people make off them. 

(and save your comments bloggers, I think that these athletes should make some money for their athletic performance.  When they make video game characters based on these athletes, I think some sort of small royalty or stipend is not that much to ask, especially since these kids cannot hold jobs while in school most of the time.  Nothing anybody says will change my mind on this)

So good job NCAA , stand on your soapbox and talk about education, as if your organization has anything to do with education and not athletics and money.  But just know, I have no interest whatsoever in whether any athletes graduate.  As long as they are academically eligible, I am fine.  If they don’t want their diploma, then let them get the heck out of there when they are done. 

8 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 8
Page 1 of 1
Brer-Rabbit read my blog
May 7, 2008 | 4:34 PM

Hmmmm...excellent and thought provoking blog as usual. You continue to be the best writer on the foxblock.

I gotta go so won't respond in too much detail. However, I can't resist "saving my comments" about paying student athelites.

Seems to me that if colleges are going to pay the players cash money to play, why even have a "Longhorn" football team at all? Why not just form a "AA" farm league for the NFL?

Student athelites already get "paid" either in the form of scholorship $$ and/or free tutoring to help them pass their classes. Also, the top .01% of student players get the big NFL draft day bonues based on their performances on the college football field.


Paying them cash to play just makes the entire thing a joke. I see your point about bring home the bacon for the Athletic Departments but like I said, the players DO recieve benefits for their efforts in school uniforms.

Bottom line: If UT were to offer pay to high school kids to play at DKR, then they are no longer "student" athletes at all...just guys hired to play football on the UT campus. That would end my love of "Longhorn" football. It would be the same situation as watching the Austin Wranglers

Dennis_delaPena read my blog
May 7, 2008 | 5:07 PM

Can't add much to that fellers... well said.

The NCAA's constant "academic spin" makes me want to puke. Actually... at this point, all I have left is a dry heave.

mspurlin read my blog view my photos
May 7, 2008 | 8:07 PM

Brer, what about this.

When vince Young was on campus, the Co-Op made a mint by selling #10 jerseys, Young's jersey.

Would you object to him getting a cut of the profits from those sales? They would not be paying Vince Young to pay, just giving him a cut of profits they were making because of him. I see nothing about this idea that is unfair to anybody.

clift34 read my blog
May 7, 2008 | 11:36 PM

Wow, I've agreed with Spurl twice today. For the vast majority of us who aren't lifelong students, and I'd venture to guess that most football players are lumped into this category, going to college is not about broadening horizons, or enlightenment, or the 60's. It's about preparing yourself to enter the workforce in a field that you want to work in. For some gifted people, college prepares them for their chosen field long before they get a diploma. The list is long of those who are doing just fine with a minimal college experience and no piece of paper. As long as you are in college, you need to take it seriously and be good in the classroom, but when you're ready, make the jump. The NCAA needs to get over it, being prepped by college for the pros isn't gauged by who walks across a stage in a gown and who doesn't.

Brer-Rabbit read my blog
May 9, 2008 | 10:58 AM

Mike,

OK...you have a point there. As jerseys with "10" and "Young" on the back are about profits specifically off of Young, I would agree that he should get a cut of that. Somehow, that seems different than a signing bonus and $1 million per semester to play for UT.

Splitting hairs here I know but still.....

Cliff...let's also remember that the VAST number of players never go pro so, in that sense, the academic achievement rates should count for something...if nothing else than lot allowing schools to be "football factories."


One more thing guys....I'm almost on board with you all. Its' a slippery slope. I still think my "AA" developtment league arguement has merit.

Ask yourself this....if the Wranglers changed their name to "UT LONGHORNS" and played at DKR stadium, would that change your opinion/emotional attachement of/to the team?

If the "student" status of the players is not relevent and they were all just paid professionals, would it affect your feelings for them? I guess the Wrangler"Longhorns" could represent UT in the same way the Spurs "represent" SA but not for me.

mspurlin read my blog view my photos
May 9, 2008 | 11:52 AM

I hope the wranglers never do that. They would probably be 5-7 if they had the play the Horns' schedule every year.

If a student is still taking classes, then they are still a student in my mind, no matter how much money that they are making.

And who said that they have to be million dollar signing bonuses? If you want to call it an "adjustment" to their cost of living stipend, tnen go ahead and do that. just give them more money since athletics are making more money.

austin4ever
May 11, 2008 | 8:00 PM

I have to say Michael's blogs continue to be well written and thought provoking! I have to agree with your points and add as a comment that all students can receive free tutoring and free academic counseling, it is part of the package.
Also it seems to me that in reality the graduation rates are improving for the football team and the GPA is at or above a 3. So it seems they are at least while they are here taking advantage of the education offered to them.
Great thoughts Michael thanks!

quirkeejames read my blog view my photos
May 12, 2008 | 12:42 AM

Great post. I'm liking your blog a lot.

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




mspurlin

I graduated from UT in 2004 and then again in 2006. I now live in Austin and am a webproducer for myfoxaustin.com. I have lived in Austin for about 8 years and will never leave, I love it too much. I am a huge supporter of the Longhorns, and actually attended both Rose Bowls. It is important that you remember the opinions expressed in this blog are mine, mine only, and that they are right. If you disagree with them, that of course means that you are completely wrong and should adjust your opinions accordingly.

Member Since: 4/20/2007